25Apr

The confusing aftermath of a bad credit

FILED IN insurance | investments | loans | loans guide | payday loans Comments Off

179In industries the world over, partnerships falter and crumble. Organizations large and small strive to work together and create something more than they can create alone—only to have the relationships disintegrate. Remember Quaker Oats and Snapple? Novell and WordPerfect? AT&T and NCR? The confusing aftermath of shattered partnerships usually leaves organizations and employees in turmoil trying to figure out what’s next for them. In the process, everyone involved wastes valuable time and resources, not to mention the goodwill of customers, stockholders, suppliers, and employees.

There are two dynamics I look at when I conduct an analysis of broken partnerships: opportunities for synergy and the styles of conflict resolution. First, I want to know about the synergistic possibilities that suggested the partnership in the first place. Partners come together for a reason. Generally, it’s the hope of achieving just the right combination of product mix, technology, information, or market access that will differentiate them in the marketplace. They want the gold ring. I try to understand the motivation behind the partnership. What was the vision? Why did these partners come together?

, , , , ,

20Oct

How great companies deal with credit – the cola wars

FILED IN banking | credit advice | crisis | debt | foreclosure | insurance | investments | loans guide Comments Off

In 1975, Pepsi directly targeted its long-term competitor, Coca-Cola, with the “Pepsi Challenge”, claiming that in taste tests people preferred Pepsi. After Coca-Cola conducted its own tests rumours spread that Coke did indeed have a taste problem.

In public, Coca-Cola appeared unconcerned. But senior executives knew that they could not afford to ignore Pepsi’s latest marketing offensive, given that Coke’s market share had fallen substantially in the face of competition from Pepsi and from new beverages such as diet drinks, citrus flavours and caffeine-free colas. Indeed, Coca-Cola, realising that tastes were changing and competition was getting tougher, was itself marketing many of these new products. However, Coca-Cola’s taste problem was a serious issue for a core product, and Coke’s shrinking lead in the cola market convinced senior executives of the need to act. In the New York Times, Brian Dyson, head of Coca-Cola USA, commented:  There is a danger when a company is doing as well as we are … to think that we can do no wrong. I keep telling the organisation, we can do wrong and we can do wrong big.

During December 1984 the company decided to proceed with a new formula for Coke. The target date for the launch of the new formula, new Coke, was April 1985 and Dyson involved Coca-Cola’s senior marketing and public relations officials, who were given the vital (and secret) task of co-ordinating new Coke’s debut.

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

TOP